Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust is a landmark case that deals with the issue of whether or not the court can compel parties to use alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods such as mediation or arbitration before resorting to litigation. The case is significant for its interpretation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which guarantees the right to a fair trial.
In the case, the claimant, Mr. Halsey, brought a claim against the defendant, Milton Keynes General NHS Trust, for medical negligence. The defendant argued that the case was suitable for mediation and applied for a stay of proceedings. The claimant refused to participate in mediation, and the defendant subsequently appealed to the Court of Appeal.
The Court of Appeal held that while the court has the power to stay proceedings to allow parties to engage in ADR, it cannot compel parties to participate in mediation or any other form of ADR. The court also held that compelling parties to participate in mediation would be a violation of their right to access the court, as guaranteed by Article 6 of the ECHR.
The court noted that while ADR can be a useful alternative to litigation, it should not be considered as a substitute for court proceedings. The court also recognised that forcing parties to participate in mediation would be inappropriate and ineffective in cases where one party is unwilling to engage in the process.
The court further held that the decision to stay proceedings and refer parties to mediation should be based on the facts of each case, taking into account factors such as the nature of the dispute, the willingness of the parties to participate in mediation, and the potential for mediation to resolve the dispute in a timely and cost-effective manner.
The court also emphasised that the decision to stay proceedings should not be taken lightly, as it could result in unnecessary delays and costs for the parties involved. The court held that the court should only stay proceedings if there is a genuine prospect of a settlement being reached through mediation, and the parties are willing to engage in the process.
Overall, Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust is an important case for its interpretation of Article 6 of the ECHR and its recognition of the importance of the court’s role in resolving disputes. The case highlights the need for careful consideration of the facts of each case when deciding whether to refer parties to mediation or other forms of ADR, and the importance of respecting parties’ right to access the court.
For further information on this topic or on any other legal area, please contact John Szepietowski or Kay Stewart at Audley Chaucer Solicitors on 01372 303444 or email admin@audleychaucer.com or visit our Linkedin page.
This information was correct as of February 2024